Activism & News
Comments 22

Why Reverse Racism Isn’t A Thing

Written by Furqan Mohamed.
Edited by Abby Strangward.

We hear the phrase “reverse” racism come up a lot when we speak about improving the lives of men and women who face actual racism. The concept of reverse racism can be confusing because of the term ‘racism’. To fully understand why the idea of reverse racism is complete and utter – pardon my French – bullshit, one must first understand that racism operates on both an individual and institutional level.


Racism, at its true core, is the systemic oppression of people. Oppression, by dictionary definition, is the prolonged cruel or unjust treatment of a demographic of people (the key word being “prolonged“). From the stealing of land & resources from Indigenous/Native persons, to the persecution of Jewish people during the Holocaust, to discrimination against members of the LGBTQ+ community, to the methodical oppression of African Americans.

Oppression comes in many forms, and it seeps into the systems intended to work for everyone. The cracks in our societies’ educational, healthcare, judicial and democratic systems have allowed the distribution of power to be only amongst the dominant culture. Thus, power becomes a side effect of what happens when systems meant to benefit all only help the few.

You end up with demographics that have better standards of living, with their children inheriting these same benefits (such as access to higher education, quality healthcare, better employment and fair representation in government). These are necessities, and when our societal systems provide better for some, these necessities become more and more exclusive and synonymous with specific demographics (such as heterosexual, cisgendered, and white).

Racism is that entire snowball effect.


It looks like black women having the highest birth mortality rate in the US. Canadaian black students having a higher school suspension rate than any other demographic. Persons of Aboriginal descent in Australia being some of the most incarcerated in the developed world, only to be out-imprisoned by African Americans. It looks like Canada, a country with an applauded healthcare system, having health institutions repeatedly failing and abandoning First Nations people.

When we look at the governments of diverse (industrialized) nations, parliaments are consistently filled with fewer minorities, not reflective of these countries actual populations.

Moreover, fewer teachers of color in classrooms results in fewer perspectives and ideas from minority groups being considered. By not including their view, we miss out on their contributions solely because of their race. Most authors we study in school are white, and most celebrated thinkers presented to us are white as well, thus implying the idea that there are no black intellectuals to study.

This is just a few examples of how racism manifests itself, and what racism looks like in ‘progressive’ nations.


Social systems continuously fail people of colour, whereas white people are nearly always less affected by the failings and bias of these systems. This, in the simplest of terms, is what we call privilege.

Privilege, by dictionary definition, is defined as a ‘right, immunity, or benefit enjoyed by a person beyond the advantages of most.’ Privilege looks like receiving lenient punishments, better medical care, and being the majority voice in politics. In this context, privilege is the ability to change and influence the direction of society, because if you are on the receiving end of better social systems, you’re better equipped to attain power.

The cracks in our educational, healthcare, judicial and democratic systems have allowed the distribution of power only to be amongst the dominant culture. This does not mean that white people cannot have difficult dealings with law enforcement, or education. However, it does mean that they will never have to factor in their race when these hardships occur.

Kathleen Ebbit said it best when she wrote that ‘having privilege does not mean an individual is immune to life’s hardships’, but it does mean ‘having an unearned benefit or advantage in society by nature of their identity’. White identity has always been a golden ticket. White supremacy rallies get police protection while BlackLivesMatter protestors clash with law enforcement. The Parkland school shooter was “just a troubled teen who liked guns” when Tamir Rice was shot for playing with a plastic one on a playground.

When a young white girl goes missing, an Amber Alert is set out, and when a young Indigenous girl was murdered, Canadian media put her mug shot up instead of the killers’. When a white person grows marijuana in their backyard, they’re an “entrepreneur,” and when a black man does, he’s a drug dealer.


Reverse racism can never transpire because it requires the aforementioned systems to turn on white people, and fail them only on the basis that they are white. It needs people of color to run these systems only to benefit themselves or those who conform to their standards. But neither of these things is ever going to happen.

The “I’m a victim too!” pathology, inherent to the idea of “reverse racism”, is incredibly frightening, because it takes away from legitimate racism and waters down the experiences people face because of their ethnicity. I implore everyone who has supported the idea of reverse racism to do some homework, and realize the world has too many real problems for us to fight over ones that don’t actually exist.


  1. If any individual believes they are superior over another person simply based on race or ethnicity alone that is racism. It does not matter if it is a one time event or a lifetime. Discrimination is to treat someone unfairly or unjustly based on anything, including race. Bullying is unwanted or aggressive behavior to dominate over others, it does not have to be ongoing to be considered a case of bullying. One wrong act is no different that numerous acts. It isn’t about the number of times it has happened or how long it has been going on, the root of the problem is that it happens at all.

  2. Zara Wiseman says

    People calling reverse racism kind of makes me think of when people get picked on once and call bullying. Both racism and bullying are issues that are prolonged and repetitive in behavior and have to occur several times before being considered.

    • Zara Wiseman says

      Saying things are racist when they are not may lead other people to view actual racism as not a big deal as it is. Which is extremely problematic.

  3. You should read my post about Liberia. I don’t agree with your premise because to be human is to be capable of judgement or justice, grudges or forgiveness. Thanks for post!

    • I will read your post, however, this post isn’t about being human. it’s about certain humans, during certain points in history being victims of oppression simply bc of their identity/ethnicity/race. to allow that oppression because it’s “human nature” is reckless and frankly ignorant.

      • I thought it inspiring that he did not stay a victim of slavery, but used his talents tofree others, namely Africans sold into slavery by their own gov’t.
        Thanks for response!

        • I think the mistake often made (by myself, too, until recently) is confusing what racism truly is. White people cannot face racism because their lives, and lives of their children, can never be adversely affected by racism seeping into social systems and the like. Derogatory comments is not truly racism, but simply mildly offensive, and bringing it into the conversation about racism is taking attention away from poc and those who truly suffer – attention that is limited and desperately needed.

          • I understand your view, but agree to disagree. If we accept that racism is a judgement based on ethnicity/skin, then a counter-judgement is also racism. If person A judges person B, and person B responds with judging A, then they are perpetuating a broken relationship. I find race a poor determiner of human beings. I believe people are better assessed on values and character because they are based on choice instead of maligning a whole people group based on unchangeable birth characteristics. Is this understandable?

            • Yes, I absolutely understand, and complete agree that race is such a poor determiner of human beings, and using the colour of our skin to judge our character is ridiculous. And, though you can be judged on your skin colour no matter what your race is – and you can face discrimination no matter your race – racism as a deep-rooted societal issue only applies to minority groups, who have been disadvantaged for generations. At least, that is my opinion! But thank you so much for sharing yours, and I absolutely understand where you’re coming from.

            • PrayThroughHistory, I agree with your thought process. Racism is a general word for judgment based strictly on race or ethnicity. Nowhere in the definition does it say the act must be “prolonged” in order to be considered racism. I do agree that some individuals experience more racism in their lives than others but I do not believe that racism belongs to a certain race. So basically, the term “reverse-racism” really makes no sense because racism would have to belong to people of color in order for the term “reverse-racism” to be possible. Racism is just racism and can happen to anyone of any race or ethnicity. Its like saying reverse-hate, because hate is just hate and anyone of any color can be hateful. The real focus should be on how to empower the opposite of these terms not the reverse. To reverse is to go backward and I don’t know about you, but I am ready to move forward. Why don’t we try focusing on the opposite of racism and hate….I say we all simply agree to choose love.

          • Boris says

            Racism happens on both sides of the human exchange, from white people and black people. You cannot just go ahead (a black person) and say something racist to a white person and pull the ‘save-by-the-bell’ reverse racism card. If that is allowed then instead of fighting racism, you are simply giving black people the privilege to spit racism at whites people with out consequences.

            Racism affects every group, not just a specific one.

  4. When my child was picked on by Native American boys, whilst we lived on the Navajo Nation, I had to carefully point out to him that there have been four hundred years of stoked anger, behind their rage. As an adult, he has chosen life in a nonwhite environment, knowing that he will face discrimination, but not racism. He also knows that he will raise his yet unborn children to take a more realistic view of their own brushes with inhumanity.

    • that’s an interesting take, the distinction between discrimination and racism is very crucial. thank you for sharing this.

    • Just had to jump in and add that the difference between discrimination and racism is so so important!! That’s exactly the point I try to bring up with people who don’t understand why reverse racism can not exist, and I think the way you’ve explained this to a young boy was perfect.

  5. Wow this such a real post I totally agree. People make up words and descriptions for things they can’t understand. xxx

    • Exactly – people take the idea of racism and twist it to apply to their mild situations, without understanding the hugely adverse affects it can have in stealing the attention from those who desperately need it.

Leave a Reply to Abby Strangward Cancel reply